Divine Judgment and Humility 

Acts 12:18–25 (NASB95)

18Now when day came, there was no small disturbance among the soldiers as to what could have become of Peter. 19When Herod had searched for him and had not found him, he examined the guards and ordered that they be led away to execution. Then he went down from Judea to Caesarea and was spending time there. 20Now he was very angry with the people of Tyre and Sidon; and with one accord they came to him, and having won over Blastus the king’s chamberlain, they were asking for peace, because their country was fed by the king’s country. 21On an appointed day Herod, having put on his royal apparel, took his seat on the rostrum and began delivering an address to them. 22The people kept crying out, “The voice of a god and not of a man!” 23And immediately an angel of the Lord struck him because he did not give God the glory, and he was eaten by worms and died. 24But the word of the Lord continued to grow and to be multiplied. 25And Barnabas and Saul returned from Jerusalem when they had fulfilled their mission, taking along with them John, who was also called Mark. 

 

In this portion of the narrative, we witness a striking contrast between the humble deliverance of Peter and the arrogant abuse of power by Herod in his attempt to assert control over life and death. Peter’s miraculous escape, enabled by God’s sovereign intervention, stands in stark relief against Herod’s brazen demands for public honor and divine praise. While Peter, a servant of Jesus, consistently defers glory to God, Herod behaves as though his power is limitless—insisting on receiving accolades that belong to the Almighty alone. In Caesarea, where God had already displayed His miraculous acts through Peter, Herod’s overweening pride is publicly exposed when his own fate is sealed by divine retribution. This outcome not only diminishes Herod’s authority but also reinforces a recurring biblical truth: true power and honor belong solely to God. 

Historical records by Josephus further illuminate this reality. Josephus confirms that Herod met his demise in Caesarea, a detail that underscores the literary and historical credibility of this divine judgment. His accounts portray Herod’s death as a dramatic instance of poetic justice—a stark reminder that no earthly ruler, no matter how favored by his subjects elsewhere (for instance, in Jerusalem), can escape God’s ultimate authority. The tragic end of Herod, as recorded by Josephus, serves to heighten the narrative contrast between the obedient servant, Peter, and the self-exalting ruler, affirming that pride inevitably precedes downfall. Josephus's account should also encourage our faith in the accuracy of Scripture. 

This passage calls us to reflect deeply on the nature of true leadership and the proper reception of divine honor. As modern believers, we are challenged to emulate Peter’s humility and unwavering trust in God rather than seek personal acclaim. In an age where power and recognition are often prized, the church must be vigilant in rejecting any form of self-aggrandizement that rivals the glory due solely to God. Let us cultivate communities that celebrate God’s deliverance and resourcefulness in every circumstance while also holding our leaders accountable to a standard of humility. In doing so, we not only honor the legacy of our forebears in the early church but also offer the world a living testimony to the transforming power of Jesus—a power that ultimately dismantles pride and exalts His name above all. 

Previous
Previous

The Antioch Mission 

Next
Next

Deliverance and Communal Prayer